Dell Precision Tower 5810

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics22.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemDell Precision Tower 5810
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 5810  (all builds)
Memory20.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150926
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 24 '17 at 10:11
Run Duration234 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3
SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Memory 89.7
1-Core 95.4
2-Core 174
71% 120 Pts
4-Core 392
8-Core 665
64% 529 Pts
64-Core 834
52% 834 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4200-$820
Nvidia(10DE 1096) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 888 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 376.84
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
22.8% Poor
Lighting 26.3
Reflection 27.1
Parallax 34.5
21% 29.3 fps
MRender 38.3
Gravity 30.1
Splatting 27.2
26% 31.9 fps
Poor: 20%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix SC300 2 256GB
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0P00
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Read 511
Write 333
Mixed 396
92% 413 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 81.3
4K Mixed 22.4
113% 43.6 MB/s
DQ Read 357
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 45.3
110% 232 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 89%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: ABX0
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 195
Write 199
Mixed 131
130% 175 MB/s
4K Read 0.99
4K Write 2.11
4K Mixed 0.21
103% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 113%
Great: 108%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$11
50GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
7.63% Terrible
Read 33
Write 7.81
Mixed 9.34
16% 16.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.47
4K Write 0.03
4K Mixed 0.03
19% 1.51 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.63%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A1G43DB0-CPB 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 42.2
MC Write 42.6
MC Mixed 41.5
120% 42.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 20.4
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 108%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision Tower 5810 Builds (Compare 5,339 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 5810

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback