MSI Z270 TOMAHAWK (MS-7A68)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics36.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive246% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7A68
MotherboardMSI Z270 TOMAHAWK (MS-7A68)  (all builds)
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170206
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 24 '17 at 21:46
Run Duration250 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$248
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Memory 96.6
1-Core 144
2-Core 288
97% 176 Pts
4-Core 496
8-Core 703
75% 599 Pts
64-Core 752
47% 752 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 376.53
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Lighting 47.3
Reflection 45.8
Parallax 40.7
38% 44.6 fps
MRender 39
Gravity 42
Splatting 37.1
32% 39.3 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
246% Outstanding
Read 2,273
Write 1,121
Mixed 1,122
330% 1,505 MB/s
4K Read 58.9
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 46.7
218% 78.6 MB/s
DQ Read 596
DQ Write 392
DQ Mixed 211
234% 400 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 246%
Great: 236%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$129
146GB free
Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 527
Write 503
Mixed 514
115% 515 MB/s
4K Read 38.3
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 50.4
186% 69.3 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 173
182% 301 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 125%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Pro 128GB-$65
48GB free
Firmware: EXM01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 392
Mixed 446
100% 450 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 42
176% 67 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 132
158% 277 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 113%
Great: 119%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
932GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
60.8% Good
Read 114
Write 98
Mixed 105
80% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.94
4K Mixed 0.26
82% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 83%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
117GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Read 55.2
Write 52.9
Mixed 51.4
40% 53.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.68
4K Mixed 0.29
84% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 57%
WDC WD40 EZRZ-00WN9B0 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
46.6% Average
Read 113
Write 107
Mixed 98.3
135% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.85
4K Write 2.23
4K Mixed 0.25
87% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 47%
WDC WD40 EZRZ-00WN9B0 4TB
2TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.2% Average
Read 115
Write 115
Mixed 86.2
133% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.75
4K Write 1.08
4K Mixed 0.27
49% 0.7 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 36.7
MC Write 39.5
MC Mixed 31.2
102% 35.8 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 43.3
SC Mixed 30.6
92% 32.2 GB/s
Latency 52
77% 52 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 102%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270 TOMAHAWK (MS-7A68) Builds (Compare 1,753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht

Motherboard: MSI Z270 TOMAHAWK (MS-7A68) - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $652
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback