Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 126%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics138% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 25 '17 at 20:43
Run Duration102 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Memory 97.8
1-Core 138
2-Core 277
95% 171 Pts
4-Core 482
8-Core 720
75% 601 Pts
64-Core 717
44% 717 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2775 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 382.33
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
138% Outstanding
Lighting 194
Reflection 212
Parallax 206
158% 204 fps
MRender 135
Gravity 190
Splatting 136
124% 154 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 138%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
OCZ-VERTEX2 3TB
587GB free
Firmware: CC27 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
96.1% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 169
Mixed 142
119% 159 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.58
4K Mixed 0.25
78% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
MC Read 32.4
MC Write 32.2
MC Mixed 27.3
88% 30.6 GB/s
SC Read 20.9
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 27.8
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 46.9
85% 46.9 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VII RANGER Builds (Compare 2,817 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER - $283

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $925
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback