Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics21.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive113% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190830
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateJan 04 '21 at 22:27
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$88
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Memory 81.6
1-Core 144
2-Core 256
89% 161 Pts
4-Core 512
8-Core 821
82% 666 Pts
64-Core 1,036
64% 1,036 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 2113 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 460.89
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
21.7% Poor
Lighting 27.4
Reflection 25.6
Parallax 25.5
22% 26.2 fps
MRender 36.3
Gravity 25.5
Splatting 17.5
21% 26.4 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 28%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT250MX500SSD4 250GB
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 412 422 417 415 303 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 422
Mixed 407
SusWrite 397
98% 434 MB/s
4K Read 37.4
4K Write 95.3
4K Mixed 55.8
179% 62.8 MB/s
DQ Read 271
DQ Write 276
DQ Mixed 241
190% 263 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 113%
Great: 121%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C18 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
60.2% Good
MC Read 23.1
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 18.9
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 19.8
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 77.6
52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,587 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $72

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $316
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback