RM DESKTOP 320

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	69.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	RM DESKTOP 320 (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel DQ77CP
Memory	10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130226
Uptime	3.3 Days
Run Date	Jan 04 '21 at 22:57
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	16%

Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	71.8% Very good	Memory 83.8 1-Core 92.8 2-Core 166 68% 114 Pts	4-Core 323 8-Core 495 51% 409 Pts	64-Core 497 31% 497 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$143 230,793 User benchmarks, average bench 68% Asus(1043 86BB) CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.09 Performing below potential (74^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	69.6% Good	Lighting 92.7 Reflection 88.6 Parallax 77.4 76% 86.2 fps	MRender 63.9 Gravity 77.7 Splatting 70.8 58% 70.8 fps
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 69.6% Great: 73%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 56GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 122 29 129 57 99 MB/s Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive		Read 266 Write 85.7 Mixed 82 SusWrite 87.9 29% 130 MB/s	4K Read 11.5 4K Write 17.7 4K Mixed 9.4 39% 12.9 MB/s	DQ Read 15.1 DQ Write 15.9 DQ Mixed 14.6 11% 15.2 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 85%
Hitachi HUA721010KLA330 1TB-$39 10,651 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 762GB free Firmware: MS2OA8R0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 180 186 186 185 185 MB/s Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive		Read 184 Write 154 Mixed 32 SusWrite 176 98% 136 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 155% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 46%
Mass Storage Device 32GB 3,072 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 30GB free, PID 1212 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	11.6% Very poor	Read 17.7 Write 14.2 Mixed 15.7 SusWrite 14.7 21% 15.6 MB/s	4K Read 3.9 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 2.8 164% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 11.6% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial ST51264BA160B.16F 4x4GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	54.6% Above average	MC Read 20.7 MC Write 19.3 MC Mixed 17 54% 19 GB/s	SC Read 15.7 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 17 46% 16.2 GB/s	Latency 73.8 54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical DESKTOP 320 Builds (Compare 71 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

System: RM DESKTOP 320

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	25x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	21x
Core i7-2600Intel $191Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	8x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	17x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	14x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	6x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	8x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	6x

RAM
M2F8G64CB8HB5N-CG 2x8GBNanyaBench 46%, 332 samples	4x
HMT351U6EFR8C-PB 04EF TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 0443 RMR1810KC58E8F1333 18GBHynixBench 47%, 4 samples	4x
M378B1G73QH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 57%, 1,052 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $482

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16