Today's hottest deals

Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics52% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151028
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateJan 08 '21 at 20:41
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$43
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Memory 97.7
1-Core 121
2-Core 244
88% 154 Pts
4-Core 462
8-Core 485
63% 474 Pts
64-Core 486
30% 486 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Gainward(10B0 13C2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
52% Above average
Lighting 64
Reflection 71.4
Parallax 63.8
52% 66.4 fps
MRender 69.7
Gravity 64.6
Splatting 57.4
52% 63.9 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 52%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM03B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 284 294 185 333 336 354 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Read 402
Write 118
Mixed 164
SusWrite 298
54% 246 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 82.5
4K Mixed 27.4
112% 44 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 108
114% 197 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 110%
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
65GB free
Firmware: 411030WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 369 262 259 262 261 262 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Read 456
Write 425
Mixed 353
SusWrite 279
85% 378 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 90.8
4K Mixed 40.3
136% 51.7 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 255
217% 318 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 111%
WD WD3202ABYS-02B7A0 320GB
128GB free
Firmware: 02.03B02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 102 102 102 102 102 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 107
Write 104
Mixed 65.7
SusWrite 102
70% 94.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 61%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
308GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 70 68 69 69 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
49% Average
Read 101
Write 97.6
Mixed 83.4
SusWrite 68.9
65% 87.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
208% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 49%
Great: 76%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$55
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 71 71 71 71 70 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
62% Good
Read 146
Write 128
Mixed 83.8
SusWrite 70.4
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 62%
Great: 83%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2017)-$80
491GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 117 117 118 117 113 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
53% Above average
Read 70.2
Write 113
Mixed 66
SusWrite 114
67% 90.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
59% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 53%
Great: 85%
Corsair Voyager 8GB
3GB free, PID 1ab1
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.8 10 10 10 9.4 9.8 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
8.8% Terrible
Read 34.1
Write 8.2
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 9.9
16% 14.7 MB/s
4K Read 7.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
27% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 8.8%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 2133 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 31.1
MC Mixed 27.5
84% 29.5 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 26.5
67% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 47.5
84% 47.5 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VII RANGER Builds (Compare 2,938 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER - $283

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $930
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $270WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback