Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.01% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive91.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
System
MotherboardIntel NUC6i7KYB
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160929
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 09 '21 at 00:40
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6770HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
65.5% Good
Memory 69.9
1-Core 76.9
2-Core 192
62% 113 Pts
4-Core 329
8-Core 545
53% 437 Pts
64-Core 536
33% 536 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
Intel(8086 2064) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
8.01% Terrible
Lighting 14.9
Reflection 8.7
Parallax 17.2
12% 13.6 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.01%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 250GB
198GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT24B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 339 343 344 347 343 347 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Read 428
Write 342
Mixed 259
SusWrite 344
77% 343 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 77
4K Mixed 33.8
125% 45.9 MB/s
DQ Read 363
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 247
210% 308 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 126%
Dell USB Portable HDD 320GB
206GB free
Firmware: 040D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 38 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Read 99.6
Write 37.4
Mixed 44
SusWrite 37.7
40% 54.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
90% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFD8213.M16FA 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
45.2% Average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 10.3
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 12.4
SC Mixed 9.2
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,003 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback