Today's hottest deals

MSI A320M PRO-E (MS-7A36)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics42% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A36
MotherboardMSI A320M PRO-E (MS-7A36)  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191230
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 09 '21 at 08:24
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Memory 78.9
1-Core 108
2-Core 219
76% 135 Pts
4-Core 409
8-Core 640
65% 524 Pts
64-Core 877
54% 877 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1950 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42% Average
Lighting 51.6
Reflection 55.7
Parallax 75.3
42% 60.9 fps
MRender 59.7
Gravity 60.9
Splatting 38.7
42% 53.1 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 42%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400S37 480G 480GB
405GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BODA 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 361 364 365 361 364 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Read 464
Write 361
Mixed 342
SusWrite 361
86% 382 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 94
4K Mixed 22.8
110% 45.8 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 285
DQ Mixed 34.1
81% 166 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 105%
Aitc ST100 120GB
79GB free
Firmware: S1211A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 412 104 57 51 49 49 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 474
Write 408
Mixed 337
SusWrite 120
75% 335 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 21
123% 50 MB/s
DQ Read 79.7
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 28.1
74% 147 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 89%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$22
157GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 68 68 69 69 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 71.2
Write 67.5
Mixed 52.3
SusWrite 68.3
48% 64.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AID48G26C19UBD Kingston 99U5702-020.A00G 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
91.8% Outstanding
MC Read 37.1
MC Write 32.3
MC Mixed 30.5
95% 33.3 GB/s
SC Read 22.4
SC Write 33.9
SC Mixed 26.4
79% 27.6 GB/s
Latency 82.7
48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 92%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M PRO-E (MS-7A36) Builds (Compare 756 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI A320M PRO-E (MS-7A36)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $245
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback