Asus TUF B350M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics77.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive333% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF B350M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200714
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 13 '21 at 12:19
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: Vega-56 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT-$359
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Memory 74.1
1-Core 160
2-Core 312
96% 182 Pts
4-Core 594
8-Core 898
92% 746 Pts
64-Core 1,119
69% 1,119 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170
AMD(1002 0B36) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77.4% Very good
Lighting 98.3
Reflection 107
Parallax 149
80% 118 fps
MRender 89.4
Gravity 104
Splatting 75.7
72% 89.8 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 85%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P5 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$120
545GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P4CR311 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2368 2426 2396 1153 932 935 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
333% Outstanding
Read 2,733
Write 2,428
Mixed 1,704
SusWrite 1,702
480% 2,142 MB/s
4K Read 56.2
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 64.1
232% 81.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,184
DQ Write 984
DQ Mixed 1,086
813% 1,085 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 333%
Great: 370%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$165
1.5TB free
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 494 495 495 495 495 495 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 515
Write 490
Mixed 435
SusWrite 495
109% 484 MB/s
4K Read 41.5
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 60.5
205% 74.8 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 355
DQ Mixed 364
274% 367 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 131%
Great: 128%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$51
713GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 173 171 172 172 171 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 170
Mixed 107
SusWrite 172
114% 155 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
235% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 156 158 159 157 158 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
69.8% Good
Read 86.8
Write 120
Mixed 74.2
SusWrite 155
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.6
218% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL8G32C16U4B.M8FE 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
78.9% Very good
MC Read 32.5
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 32
80% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 24.8
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 32.4
73% 25.7 GB/s
Latency 92.3
43% 92.3 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B350M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 343 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus TUF B350M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $288
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback