Asus P8Z68-M PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics1.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8Z68-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130509
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateMay 31 '17 at 11:56
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
85% Excellent
Memory 94.9
1-Core 109
2-Core 218
81% 140 Pts
4-Core 435
8-Core 435
58% 435 Pts
64-Core 435
27% 435 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 85%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Desktop V1 1.1 GHz)
Asus(1043 844D) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
1.92% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 3.31
Parallax 1.41
2% 2.27 fps
MRender 3.14
Gravity 1.13
Splatting 3.87
2% 2.72 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.92%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hectron HECX1-120G 120GB
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H1DB07 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 524
Write 374
Mixed 423
98% 440 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 39.9
152% 58.1 MB/s
DQ Read 268
DQ Write 261
DQ Mixed 81.4
112% 204 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 102%
Great: 102%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
213GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 98.2
Write 95.2
Mixed 87.4
70% 93.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.44
4K Mixed 0.37
89% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
62.1% Good
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 19.7
61% 21.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 19.8
54% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 57.5
70% 57.5 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z68-M PRO Builds (Compare 369 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-M PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $531
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback