Asrock 970DE3/U3S3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics8.42% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive22.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock 970DE3/U3S3  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130408
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 19 '21 at 02:07
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4100-$110
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Memory 50.4
1-Core 28
2-Core 77.8
32% 52.1 Pts
4-Core 127
8-Core 150
18% 139 Pts
64-Core 153
10% 153 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5750
Sapphire(174B E144) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
8.42% Terrible
Lighting 11.2
Reflection 11.8
Parallax 9.9
9% 11 fps
MRender 9.6
Gravity 8.6
Splatting 7.9
7% 8.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.42%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk X110 128GB-$89
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X231600
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 83 95 92 94 91 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
22.3% Poor
Read 180
Write 155
Mixed 101
SusWrite 89.4
29% 131 MB/s
4K Read 7.4
4K Write 11.5
4K Mixed 7
26% 8.63 MB/s
DQ Read 22.5
DQ Write 49.5
DQ Mixed 24.5
22% 32.2 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 89%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
292GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 86 96 93 94 94 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
60.3% Good
Read 119
Write 128
Mixed 62.1
SusWrite 91.2
73% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.9
179% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 77%
ZyRUS mini Swing Plus 2GB
2GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
0.37% Terrible
Read 0.7
Write 0.5
Mixed 0.5
SusWrite 0.7
1% 0.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
2% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.37%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273EB0-CK0 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM 333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
37.2% Below average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 15.7
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 10.2
20% 7.07 GB/s
Latency 159
25% 159 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970DE3/U3S3 Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 970DE3/U3S3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $263
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback