Asus PRIME A320M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-E  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191014
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 24 '21 at 11:38
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User BGD-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 200GE-$52
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Memory 66.5
1-Core 92
2-Core 150
60% 103 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 270
36% 270 Pts
64-Core 268
17% 268 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 3 (Ryzen iGPU)
Asus(1043 876B) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.20
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
4.75% Terrible
Lighting 5.1
Reflection 7.2
Parallax 6.7
4% 6.33 fps
MRender 4.7
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 10.3
6% 6.73 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.75%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDS120G2G0B-00EPWP 120GB
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0506A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 379 385 383 397 395 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Read 488
Write 366
Mixed 348
SusWrite 378
89% 395 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 85.2
4K Mixed 24.2
117% 45.5 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 235
DQ Mixed 33.6
68% 133 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 86%
WD WD40PURX-64GVNY0 1 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: MJAOA5F0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 142 142 143 144 143 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Read 139
Write 154
Mixed 66.5
SusWrite 143
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 86%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
135GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 94 94 94 94 93 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Read 126
Write 113
Mixed 65.8
SusWrite 93.6
130% 99.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.3
161% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X16GD3200C16K2E 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.8% Below average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 12.1
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 12.9
SC Mixed 12.8
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-E Builds (Compare 431 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $220
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback