Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics117% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220208
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 13 '22 at 14:17
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$134
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Memory 80.9
1-Core 59.9
2-Core 108
53% 83 Pts
4-Core 188
8-Core 544
40% 366 Pts
64-Core 1,191
74% 1,191 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6700-XT-$480
Sapphire(1DA2 E445) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 22.2.2
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
117% Outstanding
Lighting 133
Reflection 138
Parallax 296
108% 189 fps
MRender 234
Gravity 144
Splatting 172
148% 183 fps
Poor: 113%
This bench: 117%
Great: 129%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,688
Write 2,556
Mixed 2,277
559% 2507 MB/s
4K Read 63.3
4K Write 98.4
4K Mixed 75
244% 78.9 MB/s
DQ Read 487
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 397
298% 400 MB/s
Poor: 176% Great: 377%
Toshiba HDWR180 8TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0603
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 195 197 199 199 199 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 176
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 196
112% 154 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1.1
187% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 110%
Great: 130%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X16GD3200C16K2E 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
60.3% Good
MC Read 23
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 18.6
60% 20.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 19.7
56% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 78.9
51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,920 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $910
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $423
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback