Asus PRIME H310M-C R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	42.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME H310M-C R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200714
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 25 '21 at 16:18
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	IRN-User
Background CPU	15%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-9100F-$88 34,310 User benchmarks, average bench 80% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	75.7% Very good	Memory 75.8 1-Core 127 2-Core 253 83% 152 Pts	4-Core 451 8-Core 361 56% 406 Pts	64-Core 451 28% 451 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 75.7% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Asus(1043 86B9) CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.09 Performing below potential (48^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	42.1% Average	Lighting 54.5 Reflection 56.6 Parallax 47.1 44% 52.7 fps	MRender 42.6 Gravity 49.7 Splatting 45.6 38% 46 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$33 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 113GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF220400 SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 62 57 31 55 52 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	41.5% Average	Read 430 Write 374 Mixed 166 SusWrite 70.5 58% 260 MB/s	4K Read 12 4K Write 35.4 4K Mixed 11.7 52% 19.7 MB/s	DQ Read 118 DQ Write 77.1 DQ Mixed 33.5 42% 76.4 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 55%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 359GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 121 121 122 122 122 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	73.3% Very good	Read 133 Write 134 Mixed 100 SusWrite 122 90% 122 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.2 229% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial STK4U2400D17081C 1x8GB 290 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	33.7% Below average	MC Read 13.9 MC Write 10 MC Mixed 10 32% 11.3 GB/s	SC Read 10.8 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 10.9 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 88.8 45% 88.8 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME H310M-C R2.0 Builds (Compare 285 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-C R2.0

CPU
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	67x
Core i5-9400FIntel $96Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	61x
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples	18x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)IntelBench 5%, 147,588 samples	23x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	23x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	18x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $33Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	9x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	8x

RAM
2x8GBAdataBench 77%, 24,552 samples	8x
CL17-17-17 D4-2400 1x8GBGEILBench 40%, 990 samples	8x
CT4G4DFS8213.C8FBR2 CT4G4DFS8213.C8FBD1 8GBCrucialBench 72%, 40 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $115

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16