Tsinghua B365-N

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics29.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemTsinghua B365-N  (all builds)
MotherboardTSINGHUA B365-N(ED)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191209
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 27 '21 at 13:18
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User TKM-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700-$230
1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 94.1
1-Core 148
2-Core 293
98% 179 Pts
4-Core 582
8-Core 1,139
102% 860 Pts
64-Core 1,132
70% 1,132 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 101%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3763) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.2% Poor
Lighting 36.8
Reflection 40.8
Parallax 38.3
30% 38.6 fps
MRender 38.3
Gravity 38.3
Splatting 27.3
28% 34.6 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Foresee P900F256GBH 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: V2.7.5.T
SusWrite @10s intervals: 876 866 881 869 867 831 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
168% Outstanding
Read 1,214
Write 779
Mixed 669
SusWrite 865
197% 882 MB/s
4K Read 42.9
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 32.9
172% 65.8 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 356
DQ Mixed 66.8
131% 264 MB/s
Poor: 104%
This bench: 168%
Great: 168%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 99 142 137 131 150 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
68% Good
Read 120
Write 94.7
Mixed 56.3
SusWrite 117
71% 97.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.2
73% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 68%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston TF26D4U9S8MEH-8 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.5% Average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 12.5
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 14.2
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 59.5
67% 59.5 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $251WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback