Sales SP Educa SmartBook KN12 156 7100U

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemSales SP Educa SmartBook KN12 156 7100U  (all builds)
MotherboardSales
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190624
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 18 '20 at 15:37
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7100U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
48.6% Average
Memory 62.1
1-Core 75.1
2-Core 128
52% 88.2 Pts
4-Core 203
8-Core 208
27% 206 Pts
64-Core 204
13% 204 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Device(1E50 8005) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.7990
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
2.88% Terrible
Lighting 2.97
Reflection 4.46
Parallax 3.06
2% 3.5 fps
MRender 4.29
Gravity 2.67
Splatting 6.26
4% 4.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.88%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Foresee P900F256GBH 256GB
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V2.7.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 591 587 583 509 494 475 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
104% Outstanding
Read 646
Write 487
Mixed 445
SusWrite 540
119% 529 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 78.5
4K Mixed 18.9
106% 41.4 MB/s
DQ Read 360
DQ Write 268
DQ Mixed 64.1
116% 231 MB/s
Poor: 104%
This bench: 104%
Great: 168%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5663-003.A00G 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.9% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 12
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 13.2
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback