Today's hottest deals

HP Pavilion x360 Convertible 14-ba0xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics5.08% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive38.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pavilion x360 Convertible 14-ba0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 830F
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220712
Uptime10.8 Days
Run DateNov 01 '22 at 16:13
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7100U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
18.4% Very poor
Memory 17.9
1-Core 42.6
2-Core 76.6
24% 45.7 Pts
4-Core 106
8-Core 124
15% 115 Pts
64-Core 105
6% 105 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
HP(103C 830F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6617
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
5.08% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 3.8
Parallax 5.8
5% 5.07 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 5.6
Splatting 9.1
6% 7.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.08%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650NS38 240GB
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S190429a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 31 125 83 109 105 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
38.9% Below average
Read 331
Write 164
Mixed 315
SusWrite 97.3
51% 227 MB/s
4K Read 11.9
4K Write 18.2
4K Mixed 13.5
45% 14.5 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 117
90% 125 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 107%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013)
458GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 107 110 109 107 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Read 94.3
Write 103
Mixed 53.6
SusWrite 108
66% 89.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
27% Poor
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 9.3
29% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 6.3
18% 6.33 GB/s
Latency 337
12% 337 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 27%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion x360 Convertible 14-ba0xx Builds (Compare 656 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion x360 Convertible 14-ba0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback