Today's hottest deals

Asrock A520M-HVS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics48.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock A520M-HVS  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200824
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 02 '22 at 03:27
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User SLV-User
Background CPU 96%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$90
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Memory 63.9
1-Core 122
2-Core 248
77% 145 Pts
4-Core 455
8-Core 805
76% 630 Pts
64-Core 1,053
65% 1,053 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
ASRock(1849 5030) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1370 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.10.2
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.4% Average
Lighting 59.8
Reflection 62.2
Parallax 81.5
49% 67.8 fps
MRender 64.2
Gravity 67.6
Splatting 47.3
48% 59.7 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650NS38 240GB
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P191202a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 445 446 450 438 441 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 461
Write 464
Mixed 421
SusWrite 439
101% 446 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 99.9
4K Mixed 45.7
172% 61.8 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 252
DQ Mixed 231
168% 215 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 107%
Great: 107%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$67
1TB free
Firmware: 81.00A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 129 127 131 132 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Read 151
Write 142
Mixed 79.3
SusWrite 129
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
203% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB-$35
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
61.4% Good
MC Read 26
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 24.6
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 23.3
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A520M-HVS Builds (Compare 583 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A520M-HVS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $140
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback