To Intel X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics52.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardTo Intel X79  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190717
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 27 '21 at 16:04
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2620 0-$77
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
61.6% Good
Memory 79.1
1-Core 51.7
2-Core 117
51% 82.7 Pts
4-Core 240
8-Core 349
37% 295 Pts
64-Core 449
28% 449 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Nvidia(10DE 11C2) 3GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.2% Above average
Lighting 64.1
Reflection 66
Parallax 60.6
52% 63.6 fps
MRender 66.3
Gravity 66.4
Splatting 59.8
52% 64.2 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ngff 2280 128GB SSD
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 7B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 26 22 39 28 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
33% Below average
Read 303
Write 27.5
Mixed 24.2
SusWrite 29.7
20% 96.2 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 21.5
59% 14.9 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 33%
Great: 83%
Hitachi HTS541010B7E610 1TB
396GB free
Firmware: 1A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 94 94 92 95 90 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
52% Above average
Read 88
Write 60.7
Mixed 86.5
SusWrite 92
61% 81.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.3
142% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 52%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT151R7TFR4C 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
50.6% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 18
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 8.3
27% 9.5 GB/s
Latency 82.3
49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Intel X79 Builds (Compare 1,993 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: To Intel X79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $148
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback