Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104 181,631 User benchmarks, average bench 60% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	76.2% Very good	Memory 79.8 1-Core 99.4 2-Core 190 71% 123 Pts	4-Core 417 8-Core 429 56% 423 Pts	64-Core 429 26% 429 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 76.2% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 240 58,337 User benchmarks, average bench 5% MSI(1462 8094) 2GB CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.1.1 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	1.88% Terrible	Lighting 0.1 Reflection 8.8 Parallax 9.1 0% 6 fps	MRender 6.9 Gravity 6.7 Splatting 6.2 5% 6.6 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 1.88% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 142GB free (System drive) Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 49 64 58 58 76 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	49.8% Average	Read 112 Write 75.4 Mixed 60.8 SusWrite 61.3 57% 77.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 109% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 78.CAGQC.B7C0B 1x8GB 43 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	50.6% Above average	MC Read 18.9 MC Write 16.3 MC Mixed 15.9 49% 17 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 18.8 SC Mixed 17.1 51% 17.9 GB/s	Latency 80.9 49% 80.9 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

RAM
TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 1x16GBUnknownBench 43%, 3,974 samples	126x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	97x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 85%, 99,207 samples	85x

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $310

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16