Today's hottest deals

Samsung 950QCG

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 73% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemSamsung 950QCG  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NT950QCT-A58A
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200414
Uptime1 Days
Run DateFeb 02 '21 at 08:54
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU8%
CPU Throttled 73%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1035G4
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
62.7% Good
Memory 56.2
1-Core 136
2-Core 266
80% 153 Pts
4-Core 372
8-Core 632
61% 502 Pts
64-Core 628
39% 628 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus G4
Sanyo(144D C189) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8853
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
7.7% Terrible
Lighting 7.9
Reflection 8.4
Parallax 7.7
6% 8 fps
MRender 10.5
Gravity 13.1
Splatting 13.1
10% 12.2 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.7%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
JAJP600M512GB 512GB
432GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1111A0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 624 798 680 413 328 286 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 894
Write 822
Mixed 509
SusWrite 522
154% 686 MB/s
4K Read 14.4
4K Write 20.3
4K Mixed 10.6
46% 15.1 MB/s
DQ Read 893
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 529
408% 575 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 108%
Great: 221%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4U6E3S4AA-MGCL 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR4 4267 MHz clocked @ 3733 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.9% Very good
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 24.1
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 28.2
SC Mixed 21.3
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 139
29% 139 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 950QCG Builds (Compare 113 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 950QCG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback