Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive211% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200814
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '21 at 00:34
Run Duration251 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$119
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Memory 74.4
1-Core 136
2-Core 269
86% 160 Pts
4-Core 494
8-Core 843
81% 669 Pts
64-Core 1,131
70% 1,131 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
Asus(1043 8593) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.79
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 127
Reflection 140
Parallax 127
103% 131 fps
MRender 111
Gravity 134
Splatting 119
100% 122 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 102%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 844 796 797 799 779 773 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
211% Outstanding
Read 2,002
Write 1,190
Mixed 736
SusWrite 798
262% 1,182 MB/s
4K Read 43.5
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 54.1
193% 69.1 MB/s
DQ Read 705
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 469
361% 502 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 211%
Great: 283%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
246GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 812 777 732 625 614 610 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Lacie d2 TBT2 USB3 8TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: 1153
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 213 217 216 216 216 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
24.5% Poor
Read 219
Write 215
Mixed 84.3
SusWrite 215
41% 183 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 8.7
4K Mixed 1
9% 3.83 MB/s
DQ Read 2.9
DQ Write 4.5
DQ Mixed 1.6
2% 3 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 25%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190
76GB free
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 445 447 447 447 447 447 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 442
Mixed 372
SusWrite 447
99% 440 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 65.9
4K Mixed 40
134% 45.7 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 199
150% 200 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
182GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 291 291 292 293 292 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 441
Mixed 362
SusWrite 309
90% 400 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 67.7
4K Mixed 46.2
151% 50.3 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 198
149% 199 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
68.2% Good
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 27
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 25.3
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 27.5
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 91.5
44% 91.5 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 4,729 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $1,192
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback