Today's hottest deals

Asus Crosshair V Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics15.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Crosshair V Formula  (all builds)
Memory23.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121017
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '21 at 15:30
Run Duration264 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8150-$770
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
56.3% Above average
Memory 71.8
1-Core 43.2
2-Core 118
47% 77.8 Pts
4-Core 220
8-Core 377
36% 299 Pts
64-Core 350
22% 350 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6870
XFX(1682 3103) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.0
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Lighting 21.4
Reflection 21
Parallax 19.2
17% 20.5 fps
MRender 14.4
Gravity 15.9
Splatting 11.8
11% 14 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 500GB-$42
204GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 220 227 221 215 225 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
51.8% Above average
Read 358
Write 289
Mixed 277
SusWrite 223
64% 287 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 15.6
4K Mixed 16.2
60% 17.4 MB/s
DQ Read 187
DQ Write 59.6
DQ Mixed 97.7
79% 115 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 105%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
466GB free
Firmware: 1AJ1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 133 137 134 135 135 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Read 126
Write 45
Mixed 72.6
SusWrite 135
70% 94.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1.3
239% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 75%
WD WD1001FAES-60Z2A0 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 05.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 130 131 133 131 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Read 137
Write 132
Mixed 82.7
SusWrite 131
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
204% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 75%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
351GB free
Firmware: 1AQ1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 86 85 86 82 86 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 106
Write 35.3
Mixed 46.4
SusWrite 85.4
50% 68.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
186% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 72%
Seagate ST2000DL 004 HD204UI 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 1AQ1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 143 144 141 143 144 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Read 141
Write 45.6
Mixed 62
SusWrite 143
72% 97.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 79%
WD WD140EMFZ-11 14TB
3TB free
Firmware: 81.00A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 5 5.7 5.6 5.7 6.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
7.1% Terrible
Read 19.1
Write 32.4
Mixed 23.1
SusWrite 5.5
15% 20 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
26% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 7.1%
Great: 117%
JMicron Generic 8TB
2TB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 41 58 57 60 61 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Read 30.9
Write 45.1
Mixed 27.9
SusWrite 53.4
56% 39.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.3
35% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 89%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 331a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 172 172 174 175 176 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
69.7% Good
Read 185
Write 137
Mixed 77
SusWrite 172
186% 143 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 73%
WD 5000AAJ External 500GB
59GB free, PID 0910
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 3.8 3.9 3.9 4 4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Read 28.6
Write 23.8
Mixed 23.6
SusWrite 3.9
25% 20 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 22%
Maxtor Basics Desktop 2TB
2TB free, PID 7410
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 4.1 4.2 4.2 4.3 4.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Read 27.9
Write 28.6
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 4.2
28% 21.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.8
118% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 32GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
36.1% Below average
MC Read 13
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 12.1
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 11.7
26% 9.2 GB/s
Latency 97.2
41% 97.2 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Crosshair V Formula Builds (Compare 279 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair V Formula - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $644
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback