Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-Z170-HD3P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics6.73% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive117% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z170-HD3P  (all builds)
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20151016
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 05 '18 at 19:06
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$127
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Memory 91.4
1-Core 128
2-Core 257
89% 159 Pts
4-Core 432
8-Core 710
70% 571 Pts
64-Core 707
44% 707 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4565
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
6.73% Terrible
Lighting 7.07
Reflection 10.5
Parallax 6.88
6% 8.16 fps
MRender 9.43
Gravity 6.13
Splatting 14.4
9% 9.98 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.73%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
292GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 398
Mixed 408
98% 440 MB/s
4K Read 48.9
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 51.9
199% 70.4 MB/s
DQ Read 363
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 86.8
110% 201 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 117%
Great: 134%
WD WD60EZRZ-00GZ5B1 6TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
64.9% Good
Read 114
Write 112
Mixed 108
84% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.25
4K Mixed 0.29
108% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 104%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$137
561GB free
Firmware: AR17 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 87%
Seagate ST2000DL 004 HD204UI 2TB
175GB free
Firmware: 1AQ1
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
78.9% Very good
Read 114
Write 161
Mixed 132
102% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.36
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.34
97% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 79%
Seagate Expansion 4TB
357GB free, PID 2322
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
37.8% Below average
Read 59.1
Write 66.1
Mixed 49
75% 58.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.97
4K Write 4.75
4K Mixed 0.37
178% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3000 C15 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.6% Very good
MC Read 27
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 22.8
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 29.5
SC Mixed 25.1
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z170-HD3P-CF Builds (Compare 2,649 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z170-HD3P - $113

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $497
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback