Today's hottest deals

HP ProDesk 400 G4 SFF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProDesk 400 G4 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 82A2
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201020
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateJan 06 '23 at 10:47
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$62
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
60.2% Good
Memory 73.9
1-Core 90.3
2-Core 179
65% 114 Pts
4-Core 265
8-Core 301
37% 283 Pts
64-Core 298
18% 298 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
HP(103C 82A2) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1339
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
3.07% Terrible
Lighting 4.9
Reflection 3.8
Parallax 5.8
4% 4.83 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 4.6
Splatting 0.2
1% 1.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.07%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Geonix Gold Edition 256GB
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HCS1A25E
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 379
Write 323
Mixed 267
72% 323 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 52.2
4K Mixed 9
85% 30.5 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 216
DQ Mixed 13.5
57% 126 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 87%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
731GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 126
Write 123
Mixed 84.3
83% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
225% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
SanDisk Cruzer Force 32GB
14GB free, PID 557d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 27.7
Write 2.5
Mixed 16.7
16% 15.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 2.2
158% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown - [0x4909] V03D4LF8GB5285282400 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.1% Below average
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 10.5
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 10
28% 9.67 GB/s
Latency 92.8
43% 92.8 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 400 G4 SFF Builds (Compare 761 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 400 G4 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $83
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback