HP EliteDesk 800 G2 DM 35W

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.18% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive86.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
18 months ago, 18 months ago.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G2 DM 35W  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8055
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190415
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJan 04 '23 at 04:20
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
64.5% Good
Memory 78.5
1-Core 80.4
2-Core 160
63% 106 Pts
4-Core 274
8-Core 397
42% 335 Pts
64-Core 424
26% 424 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
HP(103C 8055) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1339
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
6.18% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 7.7
Parallax 7.3
5% 7.17 fps
MRender 8.9
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 12.7
8% 9.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.18%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 308 165 159 157 150 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Read 460
Write 380
Mixed 342
SusWrite 214
78% 349 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 54.7
4K Mixed 38.6
128% 42 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 351
262% 348 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G43DB0-CPB Kingston 9905624-009.A00G 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
59.2% Above average
MC Read 22.7
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 18.4
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 21.3
SC Mixed 17.9
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 83.3
48% 83.3 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G2 DM 35W Builds (Compare 1,021 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G2 DM 35W

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback