Today's hottest deals

HP EliteDesk 800 G3 DM 35W

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G3 DM 35W  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 829A
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20170614
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMay 13 '22 at 22:44
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Memory 84.1
1-Core 106
2-Core 211
76% 134 Pts
4-Core 391
8-Core 562
60% 477 Pts
64-Core 570
35% 570 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
HP(103C 829A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
4.55% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 7.7
Parallax 7.1
5% 7 fps
MRender 9
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 0.2
4% 5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.55%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN256HAJQ-000H1 256GB
197GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MVT03H3Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 301 305 304 302 307 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 460
Write 414
Mixed 361
SusWrite 314
87% 387 MB/s
4K Read 36.2
4K Write 85.5
4K Mixed 48.1
162% 56.6 MB/s
DQ Read 349
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 315
236% 317 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 102%
Great: 119%
Samsung Flash Drive 64GB
16GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 33 34 34 34 34 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 248
Write 31.9
Mixed 56.1
SusWrite 33.6
90% 92.4 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 17.9
4K Mixed 4
793% 11.6 MB/s
DQ Read 16.1
DQ Write 17.5
DQ Mixed 4.7
815% 12.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 101%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
72.6% Very good
MC Read 27.9
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 21
73% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 29.1
SC Mixed 22
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 73.3
55% 73.3 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G3 DM 35W Builds (Compare 826 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G3 DM 35W

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $50
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback