Today's hottest deals

Asus MAXIMUS VIII HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics181% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive47.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII HERO  (all builds)
Memory21.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180315
Uptime1 Days
Run DateAug 15 '21 at 15:22
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 58%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$127
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
62.9% Good
Memory 81
1-Core 106
2-Core 199
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 243
8-Core 363
38% 303 Pts
64-Core 387
24% 387 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$535
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
181% Outstanding
Lighting 269
Reflection 200
Parallax 226
219% 232 fps
MRender 295
Gravity 224
Splatting 127
166% 215 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 181%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M4 256GB-$218
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0309
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 124 66 90 103 127 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 307
Write 208
Mixed 216
SusWrite 107
47% 210 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 62.2
4K Mixed 15.9
77% 31.3 MB/s
DQ Read 125
DQ Write 117
DQ Mixed 32.7
49% 91.5 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 74%
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$215
999GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 353 405 388 368 371 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 396
Write 342
Mixed 371
SusWrite 363
83% 368 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 85.3
4K Mixed 47.2
156% 55.3 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 361
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 103%
Great: 133%
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$130
76GB free
Firmware: X41100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 212 265 247 230 217 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
65.7% Good
Read 314
Write 307
Mixed 227
SusWrite 223
60% 268 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 69.2
4K Mixed 21.4
96% 37.2 MB/s
DQ Read 255
DQ Write 232
DQ Mixed 207
165% 231 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3000 C15 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
61% Good
MC Read 21
MC Write 25.1
MC Mixed 20.5
63% 22.2 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 16.4
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 61%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 37: 5R 3G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
37% 16% 68 311 240 144 27" 2560 1440 ACI27EC ROG PG279Q
Typical MAXIMUS VIII HERO Builds (Compare 7,513 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII HERO - $240

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $688
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback