Today's hottest deals

Asus P8H77-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.68% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive43.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8H77-M  (all builds)
Memory27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 24 '22 at 06:27
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3350P-$60
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 89.6
1-Core 87.5
2-Core 172
69% 116 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 335
45% 336 Pts
64-Core 319
20% 319 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7750
XFX(1682 3242) 1GB
CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
7.68% Terrible
Lighting 8.9
Reflection 15.6
Parallax 14.1
7% 12.9 fps
MRender 11.9
Gravity 9.5
Splatting 10
8% 10.5 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.68%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M4 256GB-$218
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 040H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 92 33 107 138 137 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 314
Write 254
Mixed 153
SusWrite 118
47% 210 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 48
4K Mixed 14.1
71% 26.7 MB/s
DQ Read 22
DQ Write 98.3
DQ Mixed 15.9
25% 45.4 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
61% Good
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 22.3
MC Mixed 19.4
61% 21.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 18.1
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 67.7
59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 61%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H77-M Builds (Compare 969 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H77-M - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $392
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback