Today's hottest deals

Medion MS-7797

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.97% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive55.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (93%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMedion MS-7797  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION MS-7797
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121213
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 03 '22 at 08:04
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 93%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3350P-$60
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Memory 68.4
1-Core 68.4
2-Core 161
56% 99.2 Pts
4-Core 207
8-Core 268
30% 238 Pts
64-Core 221
14% 221 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640
MSI(1462 275B) 2GB
CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 442.80
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
5.97% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 7.4
Parallax 8.6
6% 7.63 fps
MRender 7.9
Gravity 8.9
Splatting 7.7
7% 8.17 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.97%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 256GB-$261
210GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 304 313 293 288 288 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 255
Write 257
Mixed 194
SusWrite 297
57% 251 MB/s
4K Read 10
4K Write 40
4K Mixed 17.8
59% 22.6 MB/s
DQ Read 285
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 149
122% 179 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TMS4GB364E081139EM Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.6% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 14.9
45% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 13.2
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-7797 Builds (Compare 441 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Medion MS-7797

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 40% - Below average Total price: $252
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback