Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 160%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 195%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics162% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive190% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory58.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221028
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJan 30 '23 at 07:06
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$358
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
Memory 88.6
1-Core 147
2-Core 297
96% 178 Pts
4-Core 588
8-Core 1,185
104% 887 Pts
64-Core 2,734
169% 2,734 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$635
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 528.24
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
162% Outstanding
Lighting 299
Reflection 82.8
Parallax 59.6
244% 147 fps
MRender 59.6
Gravity 59.7
Splatting 59.5
49% 59.6 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 162%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$120
707GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1398 836 807 835 790 835 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
190% Outstanding
Read 1,487
Write 1,689
Mixed 1,323
SusWrite 917
305% 1,354 MB/s
4K Read 49.8
4K Write 46.7
4K Mixed 44
157% 46.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,052
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 258
276% 486 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 190%
Great: 276%
WD WD84PURZ-85B2YY0 8TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 136 130 135 133 133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Read 145
Write 132
Mixed 66.5
SusWrite 134
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.6
198% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 119%
WD Red 8TB (2016)-$209
2TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 127 119 125 125 124 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
68.5% Good
Read 116
Write 118
Mixed 58.6
SusWrite 123
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.4
237% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 97%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$80
3.5TB free
Firmware: CC52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 142 138 140 136 141 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Read 144
Write 114
Mixed 74.7
SusWrite 138
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW64GX4M2E3200C16 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
178% Outstanding
MC Read 129
MC Write 39.7
MC Mixed 42.9
202% 70.7 GB/s
SC Read 28.9
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 38.3
87% 30.4 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 178%
Great: 130%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 7,110 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $892
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback