Today's hottest deals

Asus STRIKER II EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics33.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus STRIKER II EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '21 at 16:09
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Extreme X9770
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
65.9% Good
Memory 93.6
1-Core 57
2-Core 114
57% 88.3 Pts
4-Core 224
8-Core 225
30% 224 Pts
64-Core 225
14% 225 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
Gigabyte(1458 353C) 2GB
CLim: 1267 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
33.9% Below average
Lighting 39.8
Reflection 36.7
Parallax 50.8
32% 42.4 fps
MRender 49.7
Gravity 49
Splatting 38.7
37% 45.8 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO 1TB
647GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 99 102 105 105 105 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.3% Average
Read 130
Write 106
Mixed 109
SusWrite 99.4
25% 111 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 46.3
4K Mixed 29.5
99% 33.4 MB/s
DQ Read 28.8
DQ Write 63.8
DQ Mixed 35.5
30% 42.7 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26.7% Poor
MC Read 8.9
MC Write 8
MC Mixed 6.8
23% 7.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 7.3
24% 8.23 GB/s
Latency 60.8
66% 60.8 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIKER II EXTREME Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus STRIKER II EXTREME

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 24% - Poor Total price: $688
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback