Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q6700-$44 6,294 User benchmarks, average bench 44% LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	45.1% Average	Memory 69.3 1-Core 30.8 2-Core 61.8 37% 54 Pts	4-Core 125 8-Core 119 16% 122 Pts	64-Core 119 7% 119 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450 66,079 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sapphire(174B 1341) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.03% Terrible	Lighting 1.2 Reflection 1.6 Parallax 1.6 1% 1.47 fps	MRender 1.6 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 1.9 1% 1.33 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.03% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HPT DISK 0_0 2TB 89 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: 4.00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 54 59 60 61 62 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	41% Average	Read 81.1 Write 61.6 Mixed 57.3 SusWrite 59.4 48% 64.8 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 1.4 397% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 115%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	17.3% Very poor	MC Read 6.4 MC Write 4.7 MC Mixed 4.8 15% 5.3 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 5 15% 5.1 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 17.3% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,145x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,060x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	829x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	458x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	432x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325