Asus H87M-E

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	12.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	97% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus H87M-E (all builds)
Memory	13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140807
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 13 '17 at 18:37
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	HKG-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4440-$128 81,111 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	77.6% Very good	Memory 91.6 1-Core 98 2-Core 188 74% 126 Pts	4-Core 369 8-Core 369 50% 369 Pts	64-Core 370 23% 370 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 77.6% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7770 38,053 User benchmarks, average bench 12% PwrHis(1787 201C) 1GB CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.1.1 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	12.1% Very poor	Lighting 14.1 Reflection 14.4 Parallax 15.8 12% 14.7 fps	MRender 13.4 Gravity 15.2 Splatting 18.5 13% 15.7 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 12.1% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 143GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1144 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 516 (B1) Unknown 99 99 6 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 58 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 16 (F1) Unknown 99 99 4304668714	97% Outstanding	Read 499 Write 403 Mixed 420 98% 441 MB/s	4K Read 27.4 4K Write 65.9 4K Mixed 38.8 126% 44 MB/s	DQ Read 352 DQ Write 232 DQ Mixed 104 128% 229 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 97% Great: 124%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82 64,359 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 339GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 174 168 4275 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1350 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1260 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 650 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 14 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2636 (C2) HDA temperature 117 111 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	59.2% Above average	Read 118 Write 87.9 Mixed 103 78% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 2.09 4K Mixed 0.21 84% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 86%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 2TB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 234GB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 140 140 69 (03) Spinup time 133 133 34387919278 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1623 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1795 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 731 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1624 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1624 (C2) HDA temperature 176 176 180389806114 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1	106% Outstanding	Read 203 Write 167 Mixed 150 130% 174 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 2.07 4K Mixed 0.18 84% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 106%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 0215 CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 0215 CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 16GB 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	44.3% Average	MC Read 15.5 MC Write 15.8 MC Mixed 12.7 42% 14.7 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 13.9 40% 13.9 GB/s	Latency 64.8 62% 64.8 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H87M-E Builds (Compare 856 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87M-E - $129

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	196x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	128x
Core i5-4440Intel $128Bench 61%, 81,111 samples	77x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	87x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	45x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	40x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	44x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	25x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	24x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	35x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	25x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $247

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16