Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7267U 583 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	71.8% Very good	Memory 91.1 1-Core 110 2-Core 212 79% 137 Pts	4-Core 305 8-Core 308 41% 307 Pts	64-Core 303 19% 303 Pts
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Iris Plus 650 (Mobile Kaby Lake) 1,818 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8682 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	3.23% Terrible	Lighting 6 Reflection 5.1 Parallax 6.7 5% 5.93 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 3.23% Great: 10%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
GM256 256GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 122GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0722A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 118 78 148 89 79 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	41.1% Average	Read 461 Write 369 Mixed 71.8 SusWrite 106 56% 252 MB/s	4K Read 20.6 4K Write 11.3 4K Mixed 0.9 38% 10.9 MB/s	DQ Read 130 DQ Write 137 DQ Mixed 19.6 46% 95.5 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 41.1% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown GSA8G4SCL196P-26 1x8GB 55 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (89^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	61.3% Good	MC Read 14.5 MC Write 41.1 MC Mixed 12.3 65% 22.6 GB/s	SC Read 11.8 SC Write 12.7 SC Mixed 11.9 35% 12.1 GB/s	Latency 65.6 61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 61.3% Great: 66%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	488x
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	481x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $235Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	460x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	1,369x
Atermiter 2x8GBUnknownBench 59%, 2,316 samples	490x
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	355x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16