Asus TUF B450M-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics53.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive283% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201123
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '21 at 19:59
Run Duration226 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$250
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Memory 84.8
1-Core 118
2-Core 234
84% 146 Pts
4-Core 469
8-Core 899
85% 684 Pts
64-Core 1,340
90% 1,340 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$340
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 344.16
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53.1% Above average
Lighting 66.5
Reflection 70.9
Parallax 63.9
54% 67.1 fps
MRender 68.7
Gravity 64.1
Splatting 55.6
52% 62.8 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 56%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$80
377GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2114 800 793 793 794 793 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
283% Outstanding
Read 2,586
Write 2,390
Mixed 1827
SusWrite 1,014
437% 1,954 MB/s
4K Read 62.7
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 79.1
259% 86.8 MB/s
DQ Read 993
DQ Write 650
DQ Mixed 893
647% 845 MB/s
Poor: 216%
This bench: 283%
Great: 338%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$165
929GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1083 1090 1091 1088 1082 1074 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
244% Outstanding
Read 1380
Write 1,093
Mixed 1,122
SusWrite 1,085
263% 1,170 MB/s
4K Read 60.4
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 77.3
253% 85.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1057
DQ Write 922
DQ Mixed 976
735% 985 MB/s
Poor: 227%
This bench: 244%
Great: 372%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
3.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 177 176 178 178 176 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 172
Mixed 109
SusWrite 177
117% 159 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.1
211% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 102%
Great: 100%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$103
2TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 142 145 145 144 144 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 31.5
Write 130
Mixed 38.9
SusWrite 143
63% 86 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.4
77% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 45
MC Write 40.9
MC Mixed 33.7
114% 39.9 GB/s
SC Read 27.5
SC Write 41.8
SC Mixed 31.2
96% 33.5 GB/s
Latency 72.1
56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 110%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF B450M-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 5,505 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PRO GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $554
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $180Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $47
Intel Core i5-10600K $215Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-11600K $260Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback