Today's hottest deals

Samsung 350V5C/351V5C/3540VC/3440VC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung 350V5C/351V5C/3540VC/3440VC  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP350E5C-S06RU
Memory4.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130704
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '21 at 18:14
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
53.3% Above average
Memory 74.5
1-Core 85.6
2-Core 134
59% 98.1 Pts
4-Core 198
8-Core 135
24% 167 Pts
64-Core 134
8% 134 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7600M
Sanyo(144D C0D8) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.01% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 6.7
Parallax 2.7
2% 3.8 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 4.4
3% 3.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.01%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS350 256GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AP613PE0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 364 132 75 31 42 26 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
65.9% Good
Read 440
Write 254
Mixed 325
SusWrite 112
63% 283 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 45.6
4K Mixed 25.1
96% 32.3 MB/s
DQ Read 255
DQ Write 295
DQ Mixed 188
166% 246 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 100%
Toshiba MK5076GSX 500GB-$54
9GB free
Firmware: GS001A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 74 77 74 74 75 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
44.3% Average
Read 79
Write 77.5
Mixed 18.4
SusWrite 75.4
45% 62.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 42%
StoreJet Transcend 500GB
11GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 40 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
20.5% Poor
Read 39
Write 36.2
Mixed 27
SusWrite 39.3
48% 35.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 8502 PSD38G1600L2S 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.8% Average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 13.6
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 14.2
38% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 91.3
44% 91.3 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 350V5C/351V5C/3540VC/3440VC Builds (Compare 616 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 350V5C/351V5C/3540VC/3440VC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $75
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback