Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics36.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory1.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191209
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '21 at 21:48
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Platinum 8168
CPU #000, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
64% Good
Memory 73.8
1-Core 102
2-Core 195
70% 124 Pts
4-Core 300
8-Core 382
44% 341 Pts
64-Core 411
25% 411 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 64%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GRID P40-1B
Nvidia(10DE 11E7) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing below potential (86th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (45 fps cap detected)
36.7% Below average
Lighting 45
Reflection 45
Parallax 45
37% 45 fps
MRender 45
Gravity 45
Splatting 45
37% 45 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 71%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 161GB
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 32 32 29 27 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
34.9% Below average
Read 311
Write 49.8
Mixed 228
SusWrite 30.3
34% 155 MB/s
4K Read 9.4
4K Write 8.9
4K Mixed 7.7
29% 8.67 MB/s
DQ Read 304
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 239
186% 257 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
0, 0 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
68.5% Good
MC Read 31.2
MC Write 26.1
MC Mixed 24.5
78% 27.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 8.9
23% 8.17 GB/s
Latency 92.8
43% 92.8 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,003 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback