| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 48.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus TUF B360M-E GAMING (all builds) |
| Memory | 9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180319 |
| Uptime | 19.1 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 04 '21 at 08:36 |
| Run Duration | 147 Seconds |
| Run User | NZL-User |
| Background CPU | 49% |
PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
81%
Excellent
|
78% 139 Pts
|
59% 432 Pts
|
25% 403 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
48.6%
Average
|
49% 62.7 fps
|
49% 60.3 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
|
356% 1,616 MB/s
|
206% 65.6 MB/s
|
742% 985 MB/s
| |
|
Corsair CMFSSD-128D1 128GB
70GB free
Firmware: 2.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 167 167 167 167 157 MB/s
|
39.4%
Below average
|
36% 162 MB/s
|
66% 18 MB/s
|
18% 31.6 MB/s
|
|
WD WD5000ABYS-01TNA0 500GB-$80
66GB free
Firmware: 12.01C01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 58 60 59 60 59 MB/s
|
32.7%
Below average
|
42% 56.9 MB/s
|
126% 1.07 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adata DDR4 3200 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
70.9%
Very good
|
74% 25.7 GB/s
|
53% 18.5 GB/s
|
55% 72.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical TUF B360M-E GAMING Builds (Compare 1,109 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus TUF B360M-E GAMING
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 300x |
| Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples | 156x |
| Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples | 124x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 81x |
| RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 71x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 70x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 113% - Outstanding | Total price: $218 |