| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 60.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 37.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-H310M M.2 2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190529 |
| Uptime | 3.3 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 07 '21 at 20:58 |
| Run Duration | 160 Seconds |
| Run User | BRA-User |
| Background CPU | 29% |
PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
78.8%
Very good
|
77% 137 Pts
|
67% 529 Pts
|
38% 609 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$240
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
60.1%
Good
|
61% 56.9 fps
|
59% 74.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF4004RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 92 46 25 23 26 MB/s
|
37.4%
Below average
|
60% 267 MB/s
|
49% 16.7 MB/s
|
42% 73.9 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
267GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 103 97 105 126 129 MB/s
|
65.6%
Good
|
76% 103 MB/s
|
138% 0.87 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown DDR4 3000 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
|
35.8%
Below average
|
35% 12.3 GB/s
|
28% 9.83 GB/s
|
45% 89.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-H310M M.2 2.0 Builds (Compare 1,516 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M M.2 2.0
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 391x |
| Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 342x |
| Core i5-9400Intel $161Bench 86%, 22,187 samples | 146x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 117x |
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 84x |
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 74x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 97% - Outstanding | Total price: $263 |