Today's hottest deals

MSI A55M-P33 (MS-7786)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7786
MotherboardMSI A55M-P33 (MS-7786)  (all builds)
Memory0.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120831
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 08 '21 at 06:55
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 61%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-3300 APU-$90
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
48.5% Average
Memory 87.2
1-Core 25.1
2-Core 52.9
41% 55.1 Pts
4-Core 61.1
8-Core 63.6
8% 62.3 Pts
64-Core 72.6
4% 72.6 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6410D
MSI(1462 7786) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.501.1003.0
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
1.44% Terrible
Lighting 1.7
Reflection 2.3
Parallax 1.6
1% 1.87 fps
MRender 1.8
Gravity 1.8
Splatting 2
2% 1.87 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.44%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3500414CS 500GB
423GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CA14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 30 46 31 49 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Read 72.4
Write 74.7
Mixed 31.6
SusWrite 36.8
39% 53.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.1
51% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1333 CL9 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 5.4
19% 6.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 1.8
13% 4.47 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A55M-P33 (MS-7786) Builds (Compare 74 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI A55M-P33 (MS-7786) - $48

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $152
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback