Today's hottest deals

Jetway A55M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 18%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 13.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardJetway A55M  (all builds)
Memory7.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111117
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJun 28 '22 at 20:37
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU 90%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-3300 APU-$90
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Memory 18
1-Core 28.8
2-Core 46.6
18% 31.1 Pts
4-Core 59.3
8-Core 46.7
7% 53 Pts
64-Core 69.1
4% 69.1 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6410D
AMD(1002 9645) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
1.31% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.6 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 1.7
Splatting 2.2
2% 1.97 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.31%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAJ20103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 122 167 173 135 126 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30% Below average
Read 146
Write 150
Mixed 133
SusWrite 144
32% 144 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 21.5
4K Mixed 8.8
45% 15 MB/s
DQ Read 26.9
DQ Write 63.7
DQ Mixed 27.2
26% 39.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 30%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$18
466GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 114 131 131 121 120 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Read 128
Write 127
Mixed 53.6
SusWrite 123
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
134% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-040.A00LF 9905471-006.A00LF 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
MC Read 6.2
MC Write 4.9
MC Mixed 6.1
16% 5.73 GB/s
SC Read 2.2
SC Write 3.4
SC Mixed 4.2
9% 3.27 GB/s
Latency 336
12% 336 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A55M Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Jetway A55M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback