Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	74.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$89 68,540 User benchmarks, average bench 40% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	40.1% Average	Memory 66.2 1-Core 40.7 2-Core 84.7 41% 63.9 Pts	4-Core 84.8 8-Core 83.4 11% 84.1 Pts	64-Core 83.7 5% 83.7 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 47%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 155GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 240 241 240 238 239 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	74.5% Very good	Read 250 Write 236 Mixed 233 SusWrite 232 54% 238 MB/s	4K Read 33.3 4K Write 56.3 4K Mixed 40.9 133% 43.5 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 196 148% 198 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 74.5% Great: 128%
USB DISK 3.0 64GB 373 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 45GB free, PID 0331 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 4.4 4.6 5.7 9.8 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	3.76% Terrible	Read 9.2 Write 8 Mixed 8.8 SusWrite 6.8 11% 8.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.4 26% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.76% Great: 26%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x2GB 45,030 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 3 of 4 slots used 6GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	17.3% Very poor	MC Read 5.8 MC Write 5.7 MC Mixed 4.8 16% 5.43 GB/s	SC Read 4.3 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 5 14% 4.93 GB/s	Latency 111 36% 111 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 17.3% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	80x
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	68x
Core2 Duo E6550Intel $15Bench 37%, 11,349 samples	57x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	54x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	40x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	35x

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $128

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16