Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive194% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 05 '21 at 23:24
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$88
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Memory 73.2
1-Core 148
2-Core 293
91% 171 Pts
4-Core 561
8-Core 848
87% 704 Pts
64-Core 1,060
66% 1,060 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$266
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Lighting 134
Reflection 147
Parallax 197
110% 160 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 139
Splatting 97
95% 118 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 104%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$40
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P2CR010 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1040 611 220 221 212 214 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
194% Outstanding
Read 1,213
Write 1,052
Mixed 1,047
SusWrite 420
209% 933 MB/s
4K Read 50.6
4K Write 169
4K Mixed 70.7
257% 96.9 MB/s
DQ Read 817
DQ Write 1,024
DQ Mixed 805
640% 882 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 194%
Great: 228%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$34
907GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 183 182 183 185 175 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 167
Mixed 71
SusWrite 182
110% 151 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 104%
Great: 113%
USB DISK 3.0 64GB
33GB free, PID 0331
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 34 34 34 34 34 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
26.3% Poor
Read 107
Write 53.3
Mixed 32.3
SusWrite 32.3
65% 56.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.1
85% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 26%
WD Elements 25A2 2TB
454GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 70 71 72 72 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Read 66
Write 70.4
Mixed 44.5
SusWrite 71.4
86% 63.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL8G32C16U4R.M8FE1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.3% Very good
MC Read 31
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 29.6
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 23.1
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 29.9
69% 24.2 GB/s
Latency 94.2
42% 94.2 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 7,106 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $896
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback