bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics2.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
SystemVMware, VMware7,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1904 x 968 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190103
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 11 '21 at 06:33
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Platinum 8168
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
70% Very good
Memory 75.7
1-Core 104
2-Core 203
72% 128 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 412
51% 388 Pts
64-Core 398
25% 398 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 70%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GRID M10-2Q
Nvidia(10DE 11D0) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 431.02
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
2.45% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 3
Parallax 3
2% 3 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 3
Splatting 3
2% 3 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.45%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 2GB
1GB free
Firmware: 2.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 723
Write 270
Mixed 469
107% 487 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 9.2
4K Mixed 14.3
66% 17.1 MB/s
DQ Read 300
DQ Write 213
DQ Mixed 265
196% 259 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 83%
Vmware Virtual disk 4GB
4GB free
Firmware: 2.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 633
Write 234
Mixed 425
95% 431 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 9.1
4K Mixed 11.8
54% 14.6 MB/s
DQ Read 300
DQ Write 211
DQ Mixed 260
193% 257 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 59%
Vmware Virtual disk 215GB
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 88 88 89 81 84 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 10% Great: 94%
Vmware Virtual disk 26GB
23GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 88 89 88 81 88 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 17% Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-16384MB 1x16GB
1 of 128 slots used
16GB DIMM DRAM
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
59.9% Above average
MC Read 24.6
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 22.4
68% 23.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 6.5
20% 6.83 GB/s
Latency 88.9
45% 88.9 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,496 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback