Today's hottest deals

Apple MacPro7,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory160GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 160GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemApple MacPro7,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-27AD2F918AE68F61
Memory153.8 GB free of 160 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display3840 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 14 '21 at 10:55
Run Duration100 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-3235
CPU0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Memory 73.6
1-Core 139
2-Core 266
86% 160 Pts
4-Core 540
8-Core 1,027
93% 784 Pts
64-Core 2,034
126% 2,034 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro W5700X
Apple(106B 0212) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 19.40.01.37
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 134
Reflection 134
Parallax 252
109% 173 fps
MRender 110
Gravity 134
Splatting 86.6
88% 110 fps
Poor: 101%
This bench: 101%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple APPLE SSD AP2048 2TB
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 116.
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 1,441
Write 1,831
Mixed 895
310% 1,389 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 44.9
173% 66.3 MB/s
DQ Read 627
DQ Write 205
DQ Mixed 493
344% 442 MB/s
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
58GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,284
Write 2,283
Mixed 1,562
455% 2,043 MB/s
4K Read 60.3
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 89.1
291% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,112
DQ Write 905
DQ Mixed 1,025
763% 1,014 MB/s
Poor: 214% Great: 372%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GR7CJR8N-WM HMA82GR7CJR4N-WM HMA81GR7CJR8N-WM HMA82GR7CJR4N-WM HMA82GR7CJR4N-WM HMA82GR7CJR4N-WM HMA81GR7CJR8N-WM HMA82GR7CJR4N-WM HMA81GR7CJR8N-WM HMA82GR7CJR4N-WM H... 160GB
2933, 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 16384, 16384, 16384, 8192, 16384, 8192, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
149% Outstanding
MC Read 54.9
MC Write 71.5
MC Mixed 59.8
177% 62.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 21.9
SC Mixed 10.3
38% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 93.4
43% 93.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacPro7,1 Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat

System: Apple MacPro7,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 113% - Outstanding Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback