Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 26% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	3.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-7500 APU (2014 M.Ka) 345 User benchmarks, average bench 45% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	24% Poor	Memory 27.9 1-Core 28.7 2-Core 70.4 24% 42.3 Pts	4-Core 116 8-Core 116 16% 116 Pts	64-Core 113 7% 113 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 24% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 22,117 User benchmarks, average bench 5% AMD(1002 1313) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02 Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	3.8% Terrible	Lighting 4.2 Reflection 5.2 Parallax 8.6 3% 6 fps	MRender 3.2 Gravity 6.9 Splatting 6.1 4% 5.4 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.8% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Xraydisk 240GB 240GB 531 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 121GB free (System drive) Firmware: HAFEA2.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 124 146 148 150 151 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	35.3% Below average	Read 199 Write 157 Mixed 156 SusWrite 148 37% 165 MB/s	4K Read 14.8 4K Write 26.9 4K Mixed 12.3 52% 18 MB/s	DQ Read 52.7 DQ Write 56.2 DQ Mixed 157 90% 88.6 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 35.3% Great: 93%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ZFWY8G1600AMD 1x8GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	11.8% Very poor	MC Read 4.7 MC Write 3.9 MC Mixed 3.5 12% 4.03 GB/s	SC Read 3 SC Write 3.4 SC Mixed 3.6 10% 3.33 GB/s	Latency 267 15% 267 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.8% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

CPU
A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)AMD $119Bench 50%, 18,312 samples	13x
A6-7480 Radeon R5, 8 Compute Cores 2C+6GAMDBench 34%, 2,203 samples	9x
A6-6400K APUAMD $81Bench 40%, 13,306 samples	5x

GPU
Radeon HD 7660DAMDBench 5%, 7,665 samples	9x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	9x
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 13,858 samples	6x

RAM
Atermiter 2x8GBUnknownBench 59%, 2,316 samples	7x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	7x
MD3512NSA-CA3G1 2x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 643 samples	5x

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $147