Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8300-$168 49,767 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	64.8% Good	Memory 89.8 1-Core 46.6 2-Core 130 55% 88.9 Pts	4-Core 216 8-Core 361 35% 289 Pts	64-Core 354 22% 354 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 64.8% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Gigabyte(1458 365B) 2GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	3.26% Terrible	Lighting 3.9 Reflection 5.6 Parallax 1.2 3% 3.57 fps	MRender 5.4 Gravity 4.3 Splatting 3.3 3% 4.33 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.26% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HDT722525DLA380 250GB-$59 3,786 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 169GB free (System drive) Firmware: V44OA96A SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 21 24 29 32 32 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	24.8% Poor	Read 58.8 Write 56.7 Mixed 38.4 SusWrite 26.9 33% 45.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 24.8% Great: 36%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ZFWY8G1600AMD 1x8GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM 333 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	28.6% Poor	MC Read 10.7 MC Write 9 MC Mixed 6.7 25% 8.8 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 8.1 SC Mixed 8.7 26% 8.97 GB/s	Latency 67.4 59% 67.4 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 15%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	9x
MZ7LN256HAJQ-000L2 256GBSamsungBench 82%, 2,092 samples	8x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	49x
TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 1x8GBUnknownBench 27%, 3,584 samples	15x
1x8GBAdataBench 41%, 25,310 samples	14x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $118