Today's hottest deals

MSI X99A SLI PLUS(MS-7885)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.37% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive117% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7885
MotherboardMSI X99A SLI PLUS(MS-7885)  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160607
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 18 '21 at 20:15
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Memory 84
1-Core 84.2
2-Core 211
71% 126 Pts
4-Core 390
8-Core 672
64% 531 Pts
64-Core 817
50% 817 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 260-$250
EVGA(3842 1265) 896MB
Ram: 896MB, Driver: 341.74
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
7.37% Terrible
Lighting 10.3
Reflection 12.2
Parallax 5.1
8% 9.2 fps
MRender 9.1
Gravity 8.4
Splatting 3.6
5% 7.03 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.37%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 Evo 250GB-$57
201GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 462 339 353 355 352 354 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 486
Write 470
Mixed 435
SusWrite 369
99% 440 MB/s
4K Read 42.9
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 56.7
191% 66.6 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 348
262% 350 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 117%
Great: 128%
Samsung MZNLF128HCHP-000H1 128GB
87GB free
Firmware: FXT21H1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 136 134 135 136 137 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 472
Write 136
Mixed 165
SusWrite 135
50% 227 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 42.2
4K Mixed 22.7
90% 30 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 41.3
DQ Mixed 58.5
56% 90.9 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8213.C8FDD1 1x8GB
1 of 8 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2134 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
36.4% Below average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 10.2
MC Mixed 10.3
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 11.4
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99A SLI PLUS(MS-7885) Builds (Compare 1,603 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: MSI X99A SLI PLUS(MS-7885)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $415
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback