Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-G1.Assassin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics35.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-G1.Assassin  (all builds)
Memory4 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110429
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 27 '21 at 21:52
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
61.1% Good
Memory 81.6
1-Core 64.2
2-Core 128
56% 91.1 Pts
4-Core 236
8-Core 244
32% 240 Pts
64-Core 243
15% 243 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
Asus(1043 83F7) 2GB
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Lighting 41.6
Reflection 38
Parallax 53.2
34% 44.3 fps
MRender 50.8
Gravity 51.7
Splatting 40.8
38% 47.8 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 240GB-$65
170GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 332ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 191 222 221 219 214 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 295
Write 236
Mixed 231
SusWrite 201
54% 241 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 54.5
4K Mixed 28.8
108% 37 MB/s
DQ Read 33
DQ Write 96.4
DQ Mixed 42.5
39% 57.3 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 92%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$68
929GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 127 129 128 128 129 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Read 136
Write 120
Mixed 70.7
SusWrite 123
82% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x2GB
3 of 6 slots used
6GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
43.2% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 16.5
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 11.7
30% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-G1.Assassin Builds (Compare 68 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-G1.Assassin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $724
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback